My assumption at the time was that they sent their recycling somewhere else other than the city provided recycling program. Haven't tried that with rechargables.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

The plastics that are recycled there seem to be PET, PP and HDPE. In addition, the Hedgehog has the spines under the hat in which the tracks are located.

Schwefelporling erkennen – gelber Baumpilz bringt Freud und Leid. Küchengarten, Lebensraum Garten. Vom Schwefelporling befallene Bäume werden brüchig und brechen irgendwann zusammen. Vor einigen werfe ich einen Blick auf den alten Zwetschgenbaum. Etwas versteckt hinter dem Komposthaufen leuchtet es knallgelb!

Reduce, reuse, recycle - meaning recycling is the last option. It's better to not consume plastic in the first place, but if you must, find additional uses for it. It takes more of a lifestyle change though than to simply put your cans in a different barrel. Which is probably why few people are willing to try it.

Schwefelpilz High Resolution Stock Photography and Images ...

Find the perfect schwefelpilz stock photo. Huge collection, amazing choice, 100+ million high quality, affordable RF and RM images. No need to register, buy now!

Grünblättriger Schwefelkopf, Büscheliger Schwefelkopf, Bitterer Schwefelkopf, Grüner Schwefelkopf, Gelbblättriger Schwefelkopf GIFTIG!

The American mind has retreated into various competing fantasies and myths; there's no chance for solidarity among the victims of these types of material harms. Its obviously not about the renumeration of any individual, but about accountability of the source. There are several examples - Tabacco, Asbestos, Bopal, Oil, Medication, I have difficulties to understand if that's US specific or also a problem in Europe and the rest of the world.

Is that complete bullshit too, or is something possible to actually achieve, just not in the US? I suspect "recycling" there means something like "separated and sent to Thailand to fuel cement kilns".

This probably depends on the country, and perhaps even municipality, but plastic is recycled properly here. Plastic, drinking cartons and metals are collected in the same container. These three are separated using magnets[1] and infrared scanners. The plastics are melted down to little pellets that can be used to create new products. A common example are shampoo bottles.

The plastics that are recycled there seem to be PET, PP and HDPE. I'm absolutely in love with all the neat little tricks these machines use to sort the stuff. From simple ones like sieves and centrifuges, to fans and advanced imaging stuff. It's beautiful. I think one of the comments in here mentions that Japan only accepts PET plastic which apparently doesn't have these issues.

Regardless the main issue is that the US is not strict about how we label things or regulate things related to recycling. There is only a small subset of plastics that are recyclable. MattGaiser on Sept 12, [—]. I see the solution as just a better recycling symbol that a machine can easily recognize. The former might still be 1. The latter would be With single stream everything is contaminated.

And then many of the categories simply aren't worth anything, sorted or not. Digimarc have a product for exactly this. Not sure if they do the categories thing, but machine readable definitely. It doesn't help when progressive cities like Seattle provide giant recycling bins to houses with no charge for pickup, while charging regressive high prices for small regular garbage bins.

I think it is also just a huge incentive to simply throw anything into recycling bins. Just glancing inside the one at my complex reveals it is used as a normal trash bin by many. SahAssar on Sept 12, [—]. When I first heard that in the US they just throw all "recycling" in the same bin it sounded insane. I'm used to sorting into colored glass, clear glass, paper, cardboard, metal, compost, batteries, plastic and "general".

I'm pretty sure the metal and plastic if it actually is ever recycled categories could benefit from better segmentation too. Metal and plastic are super easy to separate by density or by electrical conductivity. Batteries are considered hazardous waste and have to be disposed of separately, similarly for old electronics or CFL bulbs that contain mercury. It's so frustrating. At least corn ethanol wasn't obviously quite so stupid upfront, it was always theoretically possible that it would make sense even if it was kind of obvious it wouldn't actually work.

Batteries are hazardous! You can take an empty AA-cell and drive a nail with a hammer through the middle from the side. Like crazy CGI in a movie! And it STINKS! That is for non-rechargables. Haven't tried that with rechargables. They are worse, lithium batteries tend to explode or catch fire. Cool description, I've never noticed these tendrils you describe.

I couldn't believe it either! I'm using rechargable Eneloops now, where possible. Maybe frustration because empty so fast? They seem like a good choice, only a little lower capacity than alkaline and seem to hold capacity well. Much better than those old NiCd batteries. The main downside is that the NiMH chemistry is 1. Same kind of issue as with the older NiCd batteries where they just didn't seem to put out as much juice. Personally I'm not really sure how to do that best.

Must be primarily for cases where energy density or weight is the only consideration and waste is a very secondary concern. My roomate used to work at A and one of his jobs was literally to drive nails through their lithium batteries to make sure they wouldn't explode.

I think it's just a natural human drive to do things like throw batteries into a fire or drive nails through them or put them in a blender. We're a very strange species.

LargoLasskhyfv on Sept 14, [—]. Indeed : Btw. I have an old Canon Powershot A which works flawlessly with the Eneloops. Some plastics are easier to recycle than others and I don't know if metals can be easily and automatically sorted from each other. MayeulC on Sept 12, [—].

Well, some are magnetic, some are not, that's just one way to differentiate them. Here are a couple videos I know in French from consignesdetri.

They mention doing the same with eddy currents [1] [2] I also recall seeing a big, spiky magnetic roller in some video instead of a magnetic belt, so implementation details can vary, but this seems to be pretty standard stuff. Less standard is the plastic-sorting equipment, though that can be achieved with hyperspectral cameras and the like read: expensive. In some places, there are separate bins for colored and transparent glass.

Some facilities use detectors instead. Metals can be sorted fairly efficiently. Nonmagnetic metals can be sorted from plastic by having a conveyor belt chuck the incoming stream over an gap with a magnetic field applied to it. The magnetic field induces a current in the flying metal, causing the metal itself to become magnetic.

This causes the metal to slow down eddy current braking , and now you have physically separate streams of plastic etc. Plastic separation is tricky, they tend to have similar physical properties so you end up relying on small density differences or optical properties or computer vision which is obviously not so great.

Metals are easy to separate from one another, they tend to have substantially different densities and electrical properties. Aluminum for instance is not magnetic while steel cans are, but aluminum is conductive so if it passes through a magnetic field it will still get slowed down.

Those are the two big ones in any case. And for some things that it can't figure out it makes sense to just landfill it. Plastics though, absolutely vastly harder. You can use density but it only varies by a few percent. You can use diffraction gratings and cameras to see crystals and maybe sort a bit by that.

But really it's just very hard, especially since the same polymer has different molecular weights and crystallinity. Your milk jug is milky while the same molecule processed differently is clear. But even that's a mess -- you can't generally "depolymerize" these things very easily, you are really melting them back together and reusing the melt. When you start from monomers you can control the molecular weight chain length which controls things like crystallinity and stiffness, so the quality is higher.

If you melt a variety of different molecular weights back together even if they're the same exact molecule the physical properties will just by worse. It's just the nature of the beast, and it sucks.

Even if you recycle by perfectly melting all the PET with perfect sorting and no food residue you'll be guaranteed to increase the variability in the physical properties of the output. It's just chemistry, unless you can convert it back to monomers it'll never be as good even in the best case. For metals at least you can count on a fairly full recovery if you invest in it, it's not like polymers where it's just not possible.

Even with alloys like steel you can at least in principle go back to the raw materials if you wanted, even if they are quite tricky. So what you're saying is that separating glass, cardboard, paper, compost, metal which we can separate from one another if it is just metal by the methods you described is valuable, but the all plastic can go in the "general" type, right?

Glass, cardboard, paper and compost are either recyclable or reusable, metal is recyclable when sorted correctly, and plastics are pretty much a no-go as the parent article suggests, right? Except by burning it as fuel, yes, that's basically what I'm saying. I don't think this would be news to a material scientist trained since the 90s, but marketing is strong. I think some people take the "plastic recycling is not viable" to mean that all recycling is not a thing, so I wanted to make sure I didn't misunderstand you about things like glass, cardboard, paper, metal and so on.

I think it's even harder to separate those concepts if you throw all recycling in the same bin. I think the point of the NPR piece is that the recycling symbols started intentionally and have continued to be for marketing. I don't think it's viable to recycle paper products meaningfully, but they're also made from farmed trees and burn so I don't object overmuch to them. Worst case they sequester carbon Glass is tricky and probably cheaper to make fresh right now but it's not that big a difference to recycle it.

Metal is really worth recycling economically, energetically, and technically. Glass is worth keeping separate since it can be recycled pretty easily. Paper products frankly just burn em as biofuels. I just kind of wish they didn't exist except for special applications where their unique properties were necessary. They are space age, high performance, specialty materials and we use them like they're paper cups. Use PTFE for specialty tubing, great. Use rubber tires for cars, great. Use plastics where the properties matter.

Don't use it for cups I wonder how much people in your area recycle in general. This work shouldn't be done by consumers because it's inefficient across the board. Can you fill in the rest of the picture? How many different receptacles do you have to put out on the street? Not the OP, but my apartment building has three different types of trash containers in the yard; there's one for glass; there's one for paper, plastic and aluminum cans together I presume because those can be separated automatically somehow , and the third is for general household waste.

The garbage collection fees are based on the volume of the general waste, collecting the sorted "recyclable" it's not necessarily recycled trash is subsidized to be free. There's the fourth type of trash that we sort out which is things like batteries and electronics waste; these shall not be put in household waste but should be disposed in 'centralised' containers which are located at e.

I live in an apartment complex, so we have different receptacles for each. What does the emptying collection process look like for one of those barrels? I can only assume someone comes by, manually opens the lid and by hand takes out each of the smaller containers one by one, and empties them into larger segregated collection containers.

Is that true? I was guessing you lived in an apartment complex but am pleasantly surprised by the sensible solution for single family homes.

Thanks for sharing. Separation actually works pretty well, I'm not sure why we need to "fix" that. What doesn't is people still leave food in things and don't do basic things like not throw in little bits of plastic like straws.

Separation is another step that needs to be taken somewhere else if not done by the consumer. The person throwing out garbage is the person responsible for the garbage and also the person that has the item in it's hand so they are both the best suited to sort it and the person that we should incentivize to do it. I don't agree. It is different in the US depending where you are.

Where I am our recycling has all those bins. It would be interesting to see where that is the case, for all countries. Is it decided per city, county or state in the US? User23 on Sept 12, [—]. I discovered this last year when our city posted on FB that you couldn't put berry and salad clamshell containers in recycling because if these were found then the entire batch would go to the landfill. After some clarification basically only water and coke bottles are eligible here.

I have called up the waste disposal departments now in three different cities I've lived in Somerville, Boulder, Oakland and in none of the cases did the people working there have a clue about how recycling works. They just didn't know anything about plastic. I'd be like "can I recycle polystyrene number 6 here" and they'd answer with "put any rigid plastic in the recycling" and I'm just like Surprise -- none of those three cities can recycle polystyrene.

That's what those clamshells are usually made of. Same material as packing peanuts, potentially my least favorite invention of the modern shipping industry. Is there maybe an opportunity to use machine learning and vision here to perhaps create a business? Anyone working on this? From the looks of those machines size it looks to be a big business already. BluSyn on Sept 12, [—]. Already being worked on, but hasn't been implemented at large enough scale yet.

Blockchain, too. I'm in Chicago. Literally every time I see a garbage truck, it's dumping the recyclables in with the trash.

This doesn't surprise me at all. But in many places, recycling is collected in garbage trucks, and sometimes in the same trucks as the trash with separate internal compartments. Whether that truck takes the contents to a recycling facility or not will depend on the local practices and economics.

Ma8ee on Sept 12, [—]. The trucks have several compartments. Not where I live, at least not for glass. I can see down into them from above and it all goes into the same bin. No separation at all. Ma8ee on Sept 13, [—]. I know. Just wanted to say: "I can confirm this so called urban myth. And it happens. Again and again. TaylorAlexander on Sept 12, [—]. Just thought I would share an album I made from a trip to a Bay Area recycling facility. I shot a bunch of slow mo of recycling machinery. Non-aluminium recycling doesn't make a whole lot of sense in North America.

For plastics, you can make some case for PET recycling, but little else is at all practical. The one thing I could see working well is a subsidized glass reuse program.

Glass, I don't think makes sense, except for downcycling to aggregate. Though steel and iron are not that common in household waste where I'm from.

I specifically point to glass reuse rather than glass recycling. As soon as you have to process glass, the energy costs are massive. There's plenty of money in recycling catalytic converters too. There's probably some clever economic law waiting for someone to name it after himself about recycling of metals and their market value. Also we've all heard stories of, let's call it aggressive proactive copper recycling. Your measurement of "efficiency" appears to exclude the cost of the externalities associated with handling paper as waste.

What are those costs? My general understanding is that it may break down in a gassy way, but is that really so significant that it justifies the energy and opportunity cost involved in sorting and processing it for recycling? Corporations lying to ensure revenue? No, I don't believe it. Food waste in landfills is arguably a much bigger problem than plastics being dumped into landfills.

The acid produced from the decomposing organics eats away plastics and metals, creating a toxic leachate. That stuff leaks out into soil, potentially into aquifers. Many landfills add vertical pipes to vent it, but it isn't captured for later use, contributing to greenhouse gases. Contrast that with being able to process food waste onsite or at least the neighborhood level using the carbon cycle -- vermicomposting and conventional composting. They feed the plant, and unlike oil-based fertilizers, they help build up soil fertility long-term.

I think a lot of people latch onto recycling because it is one of the few things people know how to do that they think contributes towards a better ecology. I can't count the amount of flack I got for telling people about this years ago.

If it's just the monetary cost, then in a sense - that doesn't matter. Just rearrange society so that either this is funded or a non-monetary economy. If it's energy use - maybe it's worth it and it could be arranged to be done using solar collectors in the desert or whatever. And so on. Well China did buy it for recycling, but since that is changing, the corporate narrative needs to change too. I wonder what the world would look like now if there never was any oil.

Would we have had as many wars? I guess we could still have got into space using methane. Interesting thought experiment! Just realised it would probably just be a world filled with coal smoke, but at least less plastic pollution! Have you seen before and after pictures of London buildings being power washed? The caked on coal dust is no joke, just imagine the inside of people's lungs A jump from coal straight to nuclear and renewables would have been possible.

That said, there are an innumerable number of side effects from cheap fossil fuels that would change present reality as we know it were they removed. Or not. Like you say though, fun thought experiment. Retric on Sept 12, [—]. I think a world without coal would have been significantly different though. I think electric street cars would have been possible based on hydropower and minimal metal usage.

That means cities would end up with mid density suburbs based on row houses like san francisco. Wind power would have been a much bigger deal never really falling out of favor. Could we have even got to modern development level without so much free power?

And the sun would still be shining and the oceans still full of waves! TurkTurkleton on Sept 12, [—]. It's only free if you don't consider externalities to be a cost.

Yeah of course, we know that now. I just mean could we have got to where we are now without it. Im Stamm ernährt er sich zunächst vom Abbau des Kernholzes. Im weiteren Verlauf wird auch das Splintholz befallen, was zu erhöhter Windbruchanfälligkeit der Wirtsbäume führt. Er kann nach Absterben des Wirtes noch kurze Zeit als Saprobiont weiterleben, bis der durchfeuchtete Teil des Substrats vollständig verbraucht ist.

Natürlich kommt der Schwefelporling in Auwäldern und in feuchteren Eichen-Mischwäldern vor. Das europäische Verbreitungsgebiet entspricht nach Krieglsteiner dem der Eiche. In Deutschland ist er relativ dicht verbreitet. Der Schwefelporling ist ein Parasit , der vorwiegend alte Laubbäume und Koniferen in Wäldern und Parkanlagen befällt und intensive Braunfäule verursacht.

Durch diesen Befall wird die Stand- und Bruchfestigkeit befallener Bäume stark vermindert und es kann zum Absterben der Bäume kommen. Bei Robinien ist der Schaden häufig auf den Stamm begrenzt. Nach einem alten volkstümlichen Brauch lassen sich lästige Fliegen und Mücken durch getrocknetes und geräuchertes Fruchtfleisch von Laetiporus sulphureus vertreiben. Verantwortlich für diese insektizide Wirkung sind Lektine. Der Pilz ist nur im sehr jungen Zustand gegart essbar.

In Thailand , Nordamerika und Japan gilt der gemeine Schwefelporling aufgrund seines besonderen Geschmacks nach Krabbe oder Hühnerfleisch als Delikatesse. Wächst der Pilz an einem giftigen Baum, können Giftstoffe von diesem in den Pilz übertragen werden, beispielsweise Taxin von Eiben. Es gibt Beobachtungen, dass Schwefelporlinge, die z. Auch der Geschmack kann von den Wirtsbäumen beeinträchtigt werden.

Das aromatische Fruchtfleisch von L. Weitere Fettsäuren liegen in deutlich geringeren Mengen vor. Neben den allgemeinen Nährstoffen sind im Fruchtfleisch Spurenelemente , sekundäre bioaktive Substanzen, z. Phenole , Triterpene , Lektine , polyene Pigmente, Laetiporsäuren , das Depsipeptid Beauvericin sowie Melanine und Naphthalin -Derivate enthalten. Rights-managed RM Royalty-free RF. Schwefelpilz Stock Photos and Images 7. Page 1 of 1.

Schwefelköpfe – Wikipedia

Schwefelköpfe ( Hypholoma, syn. Naematoloma) sind eine Pilzgattung aus der Familie Träuschlingsverwandten. Am bekanntesten und häufigsten sind der essbare Graublättrige Schwefelkopf ( H. capnoides) und der giftige Grünblättrige Schwefelkopf ( H. fasciculare ), die Typusart der Gattung.Klasse: Agaricomycetes

26/08/ · Schimmelpilze in der Blumenerde von Zimmerpflanzen sollten nicht nur aus optischen Gründen entfernt werden, sie können auch der Gesundheit des . You can fill, cut and prepare Puffballs as any mushroom, make a rich concentrate, but best known way are schnitzel and chips from the Giant Puffball; first peel of the skin, cut into slices of 2 cm, make a batter of flour, egg, water and bread crumbs (with some grounded hazelnut is very tasty), bake in oil or butter and season with butik.tube can also process then as veggie fries. Find the perfect schwefelpilz stock photo. Huge collection, amazing choice, + million high quality, affordable RF and RM No need to register, buy now!

Pen And Paper OMAM Wikia Explore. Main Page Discuss Schwefelpilz Pages Community Gummi Bikini Blog Posts. Popular pages. Recent blog posts Forum. FANDOM Games Movies TV Video. Explore Schwefelpilz Community Central. Register Don't have an account? Edit source History Schwefelpilz 0.

Erscheinung [ Schwefelpilz Kleiner gelb-brauner Pilz. Wirkung [ ] Lindert Schmerzen, Schdefelpilz allerdings Shcwefelpilz. Cancel Save. Community content is available under CC-BY-SA Schwefelpilz otherwise noted.

Fan Feed. Universal Conquest Wiki. FandomShop Newsletter Join Fan Lab.